Yamaha XS 650F


Make Model

Yamaha XS 650F




Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, SOHC, 2 valves per cylinder.


653 cc / 39.8 cu in
Bore x Stroke 75 x 74 mm
Compression Ratio 8.4:1
Cooling System Air cooled
Lubrication Wet sump


2 x Mikuni BS38 carburetors


Battery, induction coil


Electric and kick

Max Power

39.5 kW / 53 hp @ 7200 rpm

Max Torque

54 Nm / 5.5 kgf-m / 39.8 lb-ft @ 6800 rpm


5 Speed

Final Drive


Front Suspension

Telescopic forks

Rear Suspension

Dual shock absorbers

Front Brakes

Twin hydraulic discs, 267 mm

Rear Brakes


Front Tyre

3.50H-19 4PR

Rear Tyre

4.00H-18 4PR


Length:  2175 mm / 85.6"
Width:      780 mm / 30.7"
Height:   1090 mm / 42.9"


1435 mm / 56.5"

Ground Clearance

150 mm / 5.5"

Seat Height

810 mm / 31.9"

Dry Weight

191 kg / 420 lbs

Wet Weight

217 kg / 478 lbs

Fuel Capacity 

15 Litres / 4.0 US gal

Average Consumption

5.0 L/100 km / 20 km/l / 47 US mpg

Oil Capacity 

2.5 Litres / 2.6 US qts

Top Speed

185 km/h / 115 mph


The World's Best Large Vertical Twin Remains a Modern Alternative

A lot has been said about tradition, about how the Yamaha XS650 sounds and feels like the British vertical Twins that dominated motorcycling in the 1950s and 1960s. Present-day cynics weaned on multi-cylinder bikes say that the Yamaha vibrates and runs rough.  Compared to a Four or Six, that’s right.  But within the context of being a vertical Twin without dynamic balancers to offset the natural vibration of two large pistons pumping up and down, the Yamaha is remarkably smooth.  Not only is the Yamaha far smoother than the old British Twins, but it is in every way a modern motorcycle.

So while it can be argued that much of the Yamaha’s appeal lies in the traditions of its powerplant, it is also true that the XS650 is a big seller for reasons unrelated to fond memories of the past. Reasons like low initial price, easy maintenance, handling, styling. And more esoteric reasons. 

It’s the sound, as much as anything.  Hit the starter button and the engine growls to life with a subdued roar, then settles into the loping gait of a large vertical Twin, the sound of an even series of cylinder explosions separated by flashes of silence. 

It doesn’t purr or whine or mumble. It idles, the handlebars and front end moving with the engine pulsations, trembling in anticipation of the ride to come.  It sounds like a motorcycle, not a two-wheeled Porsche; and feels like a motorcycle, not an electric golf cart.  You can hear and feel the source of power, gasoline explosions encased in iron and aluminum and steel.  The rider, like it or not, is involved in the reality of the machinery.

That reality starts with the 653cc SOHC engine, which is slightly oversquare with bore and stroke of 75 x 74mm. The 360° crankshaft uses three roller bearings and a ball bearing, and drives the clutch via spur-cut gear. Rod big ends have needle roller bearings, while bushings are used in the small ends. The camshaft rides on two pairs of single-row ball bearings and is driven at half crankshaft speed via a roller cam chain.  Combination cam follower/rocker arms open the valves: valve lash is maintained by conventional adjustable tappets.  Ignition points are driven off one side of the camshaft. Transmission is five speed.  Two 38mm Mikuni constant vacuum carburetors feed the beast.  The rider has his choice of starting methods, kick or electric.  Weight with a half-tank of fuel is 481 lb.

Because the Yamaha 650 is a traditional sort of engine there has long been talk of its heritage. 

The engine does have a heritage, but it's not the one most often mentioned, the Triumph 650 Twin.  That engine was extremely undersquare (71 x 82 mm) and had two camshafts operating pushrods and rocker arms plus many more detail and conceptual differences. The only real connection is that both were vertical 650 Twins. 

The Yamaha’s line of descent actually reaches back to 1955 and the Hosk SOHC 500 Twin, which in its day was the only Japanese motorcycle capable of running with the fast British machines of the period.  Along its path into the motorcycle business Yamaha acquired Hosk, so that’s where they got the basics for the XS650, introduced in 1970. 

The days when Twins were the fastest motorcycles are long past, but the XS650 turns in a respectable performance in class, with a standing-start quarter-mile of 13.86 sec. at 96.05 mph. That elapsed time is the same as the best recorded by the 1978 Triumph Bonneville 750, which turned 13.86 sec.; and better than the 14.14 sec. turned by the Kawasaki DOHC KZ750 Twin.  The XS650 is also quicker than the Harley-Davidson 1000cc V-twin Sportster (14.22 sec.) and the 1979 BMW R65 flat-Twin (14.31 sec.).Taken within the context of a motorcycle marketplace dominated by multi-cylinder motorcycles, the XS650’s performance doesn’t fare as well.  But even though it isn’t quicker than the Fours in the same size category, the XS650 Twin does hold a few aces.  The Yamaha weighs more than the GS550, 481 lb. versus 466 lb., but is far narrower in engine case width, 15 in. for the Yamaha compared to 21 in. for the Suzuki.  In the case of the Kawasaki KZ650, the Yamaha is both lighter and narrower than the Kawasaki’s 493 lb. and 21 in. of case width.  The Yamaha actually weighs 7 lb. more than the Honda CB650’s 474 lb. with half a tank of gas, but is narrower than the Honda, which measures 20 ¼ in. at the cases.

Besides being narrower than competing multis, the Yamaha also carries its engine weight lower. That lower center of gravity means that the XS650 can be flicked from side to side and can change direction more easily and quickly than the Fours. It means that the Yamaha feels lighter in traffic and at speed, and steers faster. The difference a lower center of gravity makes shows up dramatically when the rider is cutting through traffic, a time when the ability to make quick lane changes is desirable. The narrowness of the engine also makes riding between lanes of a traffic jam (in states where that’s legal) less nerve-wracking-the Yamaha can fit through a tighter space with more clearance. More than drag strip times and numerical comparisons of engine width and motorcycle weight, it is such actual riding experiences that reveal the most about a motorcycle’s character.

The XS650 has a broad powerband and runs easily at low rpm.  Starting at 2000 rpm and shifting up at 4000 rpm feels natural and is enough to run away from traffic.  Below 4000 rpm. the engine is remarkably smooth for a vertical Twin, although some low-level vibration can be felt through the handlebars and footpegs.  Even so, the mirror image is reasonably clear. The bike makes its best power above 5000 rpm, but low-frequency vibration increases dramatically above that engine speed and can be felt through the seat as well as through the rubber-mounted bars and pegs. In spite of the fact that the KZ750 Twin has dynamic balancers to theoretically reduce engine vibration, the XS650 actually vibrates less at higher rpm than the Kawasaki.  The Yamaha is also smoother than Triumphs we’ve ridden.

An indicated 65 mph requires about 4200 rpm, and at that engine speed the machine is smooth enough that our riders could stand a long day in the saddle without discomfort. 

A long day wouldn’t make the rider’s arm or wrist sore from holding the twist grip open, because the Yamaha doesn’t have excessively strong carburetor return springs.  Besides making life a little easier for the rider’s throttle arm, the butterfly-throttle, vacuum-piston Mikunis also have a lot to do with the Yamaha’s excellent gas mileage. The bike averaged 51.4 mpg on the Cycle World test loop, a mixture of city and highway riding and did marginally better (51.6 mpg) in constant-speed high- way riding; That means an XS650 ridden at an indicated 65 or 70 mph on the highway can travel about 200 miles before the fuel tank runs dry.  Even during the hardest highway running, the Yamaha delivered 46.8 mpg, a figure some multis couldn’t reach at a constant 40 mph.  But back in town the carburetors contribute to an annoying amount of driveline snatch, especially when creeping along in first or second gear with traffic.  It is impossible to accurately control engine speed at very low rpm in the lower gears and the bike won't stay at a steady speed.  Instead, the machine wants to constantly accelerate or decelerate - a constant state isn’t attainable.

Accumulated transmission gear engagement dog tolerances combine with the low-speed carburetion inaccuracies to cause the Yamaha to jerk back and forth as throttle is applied or released. The trait can be compensated for by careful use of the throttle and clutch, but idling smoothly along-in gear and with the clutch out isn't possible.

he transmission which has proven itself during the XS650’s lifetime requires a firm foot on the shift lever. It doesn’t clunk, but is a bit hesitant to slide from gear to gear. The transmission works, but won’t earn praise for effortless or slick shifting.

The only time the clutch demands notice is immediately after a cold start. The clutch squeals and squalls at the engagement point, grabbing and making smooth starts difficult or impossible. The noise is caused by inadequate initial lubrication of the clutch basket bushing, which is only stressed when the clutch is disengaged. After a few minutes of running, oil reaches the bushing and the squall disappears. A Yamaha spokesman said that XS650s have always had that peculiarity, but that it isn’t harmful.

he bike starts easily even on cold mornings if the correct procedure is followed.  The “choke” lever actually activates enrichening circuits in the carburetors.  With the “choke” on and the throttle left closed, the XS650 starts quickly.  But the motorcycle won’t start if the throttle is opened at all.

By removing the passenger grab strap and substituting a grab rail behind the seat, Yamaha engineers improved the XS650’s seat a great deal. Seat grab straps have a nasty habit of being positioned just where the solo rider wants to sit, making the seat less comfortable at best and often numbing the rider’s butt during long rides.  The 1979 version of the 650, thanks to that simple change and also the suspension, is the most comfortable XS650 so far.  Fork compliance is good. With a 140-lb. rider and no baggage, the rear shocks are too stiff, but that’s a matter of personal preference.  Suspension action on both large and small bumps is above average.

he only chassis flaw encountered during highway testing was a tendency for the Bridgestone Super Speed tires to follow freeway rain grooves and produce a slight front end oscillation noticeable through the handlebars.

In sporting use the XS650 acquitted itself well, largely because of its low center of gravity and ability to turn quickly without requiring a lot of rider force. Instead of having to lift the bike up - as is the case with many street bikes - from one side and throw it down on the other side to make fast left-right transitions (as in ess curves) the rider can accomplish the same thing with far less effort.  Simply put, the Yamaha Twin responds to rider input quickly and easily. Only the fastest, quickest - entry turns produced the barest hint of a wallow with the shocks at the lowest preload setting. At the highest speeds it is capable of attaining, the XS650 handles almost perfectly. Ground Clearance is excellent, and only the hardest riding is likely to drag parts. On the left side, the side stand scrapes. On the right side the footpeg and muffler bracket mount bolt will scrape, but only at the point at which the tires slide and lose traction. When the bracket bolt touches down, the rider better be ready to try a flat-track-style slide or else abandon ship. It takes an extreme lean angle to get into that kind of trouble.

he single front disc feels strong and is controllable, but we had problems keeping the rear drum from locking during panic stops (for braking distance tests). Rear brake control under normal conditions wasn’t a problem. Front brake effectiveness is limited by tire adhesion - the brake can deliver more stopping power than available tire traction can handle. Finding the point of maximum deceleration while avoiding lock-up is not difficult.

Instruments, lights, controls and electrics are all what we’ve come to expect  from Yamaha. They work, and work well. Turn signals are self-canceling.  Instrument illumination at night is especially good. The numbers on the speedometer and tachometer appear white during daylight hours, but glow a subtle orange at night. Readability is excellent and so is speedometer accuracy: indicated 60 mph is actually 59.36 mph.

he fact that motorcyclists today are not surprised when a bike has reliable electrics and readable instruments and easy-to-use controls shows just how far motorcycling has come since the days of British dominance. Old-time Triumph owners never bought one replacement part - they bought two.

The XS650 really isn’t very much like the Triumphs and BSAs of old.  It’s a modern motorcycle, refined and honed and civilized, and it does what it does very well.

Source Cycle World" magazine March, 1979