Four
stroke, transverse three cylinder. DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Capacity
955 cc / 58.3 cu in
Cooling System
Liquid cooled
Bore x Stroke
79 x 65 mm
Lubrication
Wet sump
Compression Ratio
12.0:1
Induction
Multipoint sequential
electronic fuel injection
Engine Oil
Synthetic, 10W/40
Ignition
Digital CDI
Spark Plug
NGK, CR9EK
Starting
Electric
Battery
12V, 12Ah
Max Power
87.5 kW / 120 hp @ 9100 rpm
Max Torque
100 Nm / 10.2 kg-m / 74
ft-lb @ 5100 rpm
Clutch
Wet, multiple discs, cable operated
Transmission
6 Speed
Final Drive
Chain
Frame
Aluminium, twin spar
Front Suspension
45 mm Forks with dual rate
springs and adjustable preload
Front
Wheel travel
127 mm / 5.0 in
Rear Suspension
Monoshock with adjustable
preload, compression and rebound damping
Rear
Wheel travel
147 mm / 5.8 in
Front Brakes
2 x 320 mm Discs, 4 piston calipers
Rear Brakes
Single 255 mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Wheels Front
Alloy 3 spoke, 17 x 3.5 in
Wheels Rear
Alloy 3 spoke, 17 x 6.0 in
Front Tyre
120/70 ZR17
Rear Tyre
180/55 ZZR17
Rake
25.3º
Trail
94 mm / 3.7 in
Dimensions
Length 2160 mm / 85.0 in
Width 735 mm / 28.9 in (handlebars)
Height 1220 mm / 48.0 in
Wheelbase
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Seat Height
800 mm / 31.5 in
Wet Weight
249 kg / 456 lbs
GVWR
453 kg / 999 lbs
Fuel Capacity
19.5 Litres / 5.2 US gal / 4.3
Imp gal
Fuel
Reserve
1.1 Litres / 0.3 US gal / 0.2 Imp gal
Consumption Average
6.5 L/100 km / 15.3 km/l / 36 US mpg / 43.2 Imp mpg
Standing
¼ Mile
11.0 sec
Top Speed
231 km/h / 143.5 mph
First unveiled at the end of 1998, Triumph's
Sprint ST is the Hinckley firm's interpretation of the modern sports-tourer
bike. Long dominated by Honda's VFR800, this competitive sector of the
market requires a machine with the comfort for easy 1200km (750-mile) days,
as well as track-friendly performance on arrival. On paper, the Sprint ST
fits the bill. Powered by Triumph's latest 955cc three-cylinder engine, the
ST can hit 256km/h (160mph), while weighing less than the VFR, at just 207kg
(4561b). Adjustable suspension and sporty tyres add chassis sporting
potential, and the sleek bodywork and single-sided swingarm supply classic
good looks. Strong, sportsbike brakes give class-leading performance.
Road test by Adrian Percival Triumph's new Sprint ST is already a huge success, but has it got what it
takes to be the No1 in the Sports Tourer market?
So what is a Sports Tourer then? Well, a true sports tourer is a bike that
can be pushed along at a respectable pace and with some determination whilst
offering running gear that allows this somewhat spirited going, but there's
more.. A Sports Tourer will allow you to sit on it all day without getting a
bad back, sore arms and neck ache, carry a pillion in relative comfort, load
up your stuff into good, usually optional, factory luggage, boast a pretty
high level of wind protection and have very good reliability. So building a
proper sports tourer demands a lot from any manufacturer, in fact it is
possibly the closest thing to demanding the "perfect" all round motorcycle.
The sports tourer class is quite well populated but there are not too many
bikes that have been designed to have a true dual role, and there are few
that do it particularly well.
Triumph's Sprint ST has been universally acclaimed as one of the kings of
the sports tourer category. The power delivery is smooth all the way up the
rev range, just like a sports tourer should be, and with the same engine as
the Speed Triple and Sprint RS the engine is just right for its intended
task. The injected 118bhp, 75ft-lb torque 955cc triple powerplant has been
retuned for a bit more midrange grunt, but isn't lacking anywhere in its new
guise. Just wind it on and you're given a smooth, linear spread of power
from tickover all the way to the bike's 9500rpm redline. The engine spins
freely through the gears, utilising a revised claw-type gear-change
mechanism and giving a much smoother and more positive shift action than on
previous models.It really doesn't take much time at all to get well into
illegal speeds, and not realise it!
The latest exhaust system has been modified with new downpipes and
balance-pipe to boost midrange, and to satisfy the emission-police in Europe
and North America. A nice idea is the two-position exhaust, either fixed
high for added cornering clearance, or lower down to allow room for fitted
luggage. Bodywork is nigh-on the same with the graphics changed and the
twin-spar aluminium frame and single-side swingarm remain unchanged.
The one thing that still stands out with the Sprint ST and all the other
triples from Triumph is the noise, it sounds great, even if it is from a
standard silencer, put an aftermarket pipe on there and it sounds fantastic!
(he says speaking from past experience with my own high level carbon race
can on my T595!)
The brakes on the Sprint ST are absolutely brilliant. Four-piston calipers
on 320mm discs up front have good initial bite when hauling the bike down
from high speeds, but combine that with plenty of power and feel and you
have superbike brakes on a Sports Tourer! A few years ago you just wouldn't
get this type of set up on this type of bike. The rear brake is ok but in
comparison to the front is is non-existent, but who cares, apart from the
odd U-turn who needs rear brakes!
Getting on the bike you are greeted with a neat array of instruments and
good controls. The seating and positioning are very good for almost any
distance complemented by a slightly forward riding position, with the
footpegs giving good legroom and allowing knees and upper legs to slot into
the tank cutouts perfectly, and the protection from the broad, but not too
high screen is excellent even at high speed. To ride the Sprint ST around
town and in traffic is an absolute doddle. You would think that riding a
207kg bike would be somewhat difficult but the ST hides its weight very
well. With its smooth power delivery at the lowest of speeds you can
concentrate on riding rather than throttle control, unlike on some other
bikes, allowing you a more relaxed time of it. Out on the open roads is
where you find the Sprint coming into its own though, it handles well,
steers well and even with minimal suspension adjustment takes most roads in
its stride. The only criticism I would have here is that the front end is a
little soft for my liking, but with a little playing around with the
pre-load I'm sure it would sort itself out.
During my time with the bike I had an opportunity to carry a pillion for
some 70 odd miles and the ST seemed totally un-phased by this. The comfort
(so I'm told was excellent) and the overall stability was un-effected and
wind buffet was not increased. On that particular day I managed to cover
some 260 miles running between meetings and I can honestly say that it
didn't feel like it at all. On some bikes you know you have done it, but the
ST just took it all in its stride, but then I suppose that's what a Sports
Tourer is all about really.
The overall quality of the Sprint ST is excellent, I had the silver version
as you can see in the photographs. There are some nice touches with the ST
including a pillion seat cowling (a factory option) and the broad pad on the
bottom of the sidestand, eliminating the need to search for bits of wood etc
on soft surfaces. Optional factory extras include fitted panniers (including
bracket kit to angle the pipe a bit lower), heated grips and a rear hugger.
It was sad to drop the Sprint ST back at Triumph's factory in Hinckley, it
had taken me on numerous journeys over the past week and it had been a
pleasure to ride it. Value for money, comfortable, easy to ride, well made,
they're all words which can be used to sum up the Sprint ST, but they give
no idea of the satisfaction you get from riding one of these bikes. If
you're looking for a Sports Tourer then there are a lot of bikes out there,
Honda's VFR800, Ducati's ST4, Aprilia's Falco, are all contenders for this
segment of the market. This makes the final decision hard, but with the
advent of the new Triumph Sprint ST, the choice could have just become a
whole lot easier...
Second opinion by Dick Henneman In 2002 Triumph took the decision to put the 955i Daytona engine in their
sports tourer - and an excellent decision it was too! For this year they've
left things alone apart from a colour change, which is good and then again
not so good. But I'm getting ahead of myself.
Throw a leg over the deep, well-padded seat and the average rider will have
no problems getting both feet firmly on the ground. It's only a short reach
to the bars and all the usual controls fall easily to hand, to give a
relaxed riding position that's best described as being on the sporting side
of touring. A couple of hours in the saddle won't cause any of the
numb-buttock and leg-twitching sensations common with more focused
sportsbike riding, but at the same time there's plenty of space to move
around on the bike and even hang well off if you want to get a move on.
Sounds about right then!
The instruments are mostly analogue, with a large central white-faced tacho,
smaller fuel and water temperature gauges on the right and the speedo with
digital odometer and trip on the left. And almost as an afterthought there's
a small digital clock that's so deeply recessed that you have have your head
in just the right position in order to see it. Below the screen there's the
usual row of "idiot-lights" for indicators, high beam, oil pressure, low
fuel, neutral, charge and engine management maladies. On the move everything
apart from the clock is easy to read, although the numbers on the speedo are
a bit small and close together. However, by modern standards the whole thing
is beginning to look a bit dated.
OK - let's get this thing rolling.
Turn on the ignition, check for neutral and press the starter button.
Nothing! Ah - it's a Triumph, so you have to pull in the clutch lever. Press
the button again and after a couple of revolutions the engine rumbles into
life and the engine management system sets it into a fast idle. A quick
check on the controls before setting off - just a minute, I can pull the
front brake lever back to the bars! I'm assured that this is normal
(normal?), but I'm not convinced and I'm going to take things easy for the
first couple of miles and check this out. Into first and the light clutch
engages smoothly and the engines pulls away cleanly and strongly.
Right, let's look at these brakes. Straight quiet road, plenty of space, 40
mph, de-clutch, gentle pull on the brake lever - Strewth! I almost land on
the front tyre. No problems with the front brakes then, and as I clock up
more miles I find that hard stops from seriously silly three-figure speeds
rarely needs more than a gentle two-finger pull on the lever. The rear brake
however can best be described as "for MoTs only", since even standing hard
on the pedal seems to have no discernable effect upon forward motion. Hmm?
Back to the riding. The 955 motor really is a stonker, and de-tuned from its
Daytona-spec it develops even more torque for fuss-free, press-on riding.
Its ability to pull hard and clean from 2,500rpm in any gear makes
overtaking a doddle, and even with a pillion and a full luggage load,
steamin' across Europe is not going to be a problem on the ST. With the
tacho red-lined at 9,500 this is an engine that doesn't need to be revved to
get the most from it, as the wide spread of torque means that you don't have
to be going up and down the box all the time to make good progress. Which is
perhaps just as well as the gearchange on the test bike was rather stiff and
notchy, although there was never a problem selecting a gear or getting any
false neutrals. Perhaps it will loosen up after a few thousand miles. The
Sagem engine management system does a good job of getting the right amount
of fuel/air mix into the engine at the right time, but there there were one
or two "snatchy" moments when cracking the throttle open in low-speed
second-gear corners. Some of this might have been down to a little too much
slack in the throttle cable or the drive chain loosening up from new, but we
didn't have time during the test to adjust these and see if they made any
difference. And although the bike came with a comprehensive toolkit, we
didn't have the handbook to find out the correct settings.
The dual-rate springs in the 43mm front forks work well with the monoshock
on the rear single-sided swingarm, to give a firm but compliant ride that
soaks up the bumps but still provides plenty of feedback. It's only when the
pace hots up that the lack of any damping adjustment on the forks makes its
presence felt, and the the front can get a little twitchy but things never
get out of hand. This is a good-handling bike that steers well, can be used
to attack corners and holds a stable line through the bends; the whole plot
being supplemented by that glorious engine with its wonderful three-cylinder
growl and exhaust note, slightly subdued now with an 80dbA end can. At the
rear there's adjustable compression damping and a simple preload adjuster
that can be accessed with a screwdriver blade through a hole in the left
side of the frame; both useful features for a bike that may need to be well
loaded up for those touring two-up touring trips across the continent.
Like all their bikes, Triumph can supply a comprehensive range of
accessories for the ST from a 3-box luggage set to a rear seat cowl, by way
of a carbon endcan, paddock stand, alarm, dust cover, heated grips and even
a disc brake lock. You'll probably need their tank bag if you're going
touring, as your magnetic one won't stick well to the composite petrol tank
on the ST.
Although the fairing shape is not cutting-edge and may not be to everyone's
taste, there's no doubt that it's incredibly effective. At speed, there's
just enough wind pressure to take the small amount of body weight off the
wrists, and the rest is deflected cleanly over the helmet to give a very
relaxed ride. Add to this the stress-free nature of the engine and it's
superb pulling ability, and you can find 120+mph indicated on the speedo
without even trying. Which can be a little disturbing on a 50-limit road!
The fairing also contributes to the good fuel consumption figures, and
although we didn't thrash the n*ts off it, it was ridden reasonably hard for
most of the time on test and we never got less than 40 mpg. With a 19.5
litre tank this gives a useful range of 160+ miles between fuel stops; but
the fuel gauge will be showing almost empty by 120 miles, although at 100
miles it will still be on full.
If all this sounds as though I liked this bike, then you'd be right. But
there are a few flies in the ointment. I'm just under 6 foot tall and not
known for being long in the leg, but my knees were rubbing hard against the
rear edges of fairing panels. While this wasn't uncomfortable, it was
unexpected on a bike of this size and is certainly going to mark the panels
after a few thousand miles. Moving the pegs would be an option but you're
unlikely to find someone making rearsets for a Sprint ST, and if you do then
they're certainly not going to improve the comfort factor of the riding
position. And the fairing panels don't appear to fit the frame too well. The
top edge of the panel doesn't follow the line of the frame, and the gap
between the two varies considerably from front to rear. The rear bodywork
also comes in for some criticism as the lower part of this completely open.
This means that muck from the rear wheel is going to get up inside the rear
subframe and make a right mess of everything the first time you go out in
the rain. A rear hugger would improve matters here, but you'll have to pay
extra to get one fitted.
Conclusion
The Sprint ST is aimed directly at the section of the market that for many
years now has been dominated by the Honda VFR, so the boys at Hinkley have
given themselves a tough challenge. They should be complimented for
producing a bike that has all the dynamic qualities that a sports tourer
requires.