Four stroke, 45° V-Twin, OHV, 2
valves per cylinder.
Capacity
1207 cc / 73.6 cu-in
Bore x Stroke
87.3 x 100.8 mm
Cooling System
Air cooled
Compression Ratio
8.0:1
Induction
Single 38mm Keihin carb
Starting
Kick, folding crank
Max Power
65 hp @ 5500 rpm
Transmission
4 Speed
Final Drive
Chain
Front Suspension
Telescopic forks
Rear Suspension
Swinging fork.
Front Brakes
Drum
Rear Brakes
Drum
Front Tyre
3.25-19
Rear Tyre
5.10-16
Weight
Fuel Capacity
12.5 Litres / 3.3 US gal
With a gap between
the smaller XL models and the larger FLBs, Harley announced the all new FX
series for 1971. By joining the frame of the FL with the suspension of the XL,
Harley hoped that the latest entry would appeal to a wider audience. The unusual
boat tail rear fender that was first seen on the 1970 Sportsters was also
installed on the FX. While the styling was certainly different.
Road Test Cycle
1970
Gone are the floorboards, relics from the Flood; gone are the ponderous front
forks, the incredible fenders, the saddlebags, the radio, the windshield, the
Neat Pleat Buddy Seat, hinged and plungered; gone is the electric starter, gone
its mammoth battery. The members of the Harley-Davidson styling team, in
response to the genius of Dick Hirschberg, the impact of the Chopper Phenomenon,
and the success of "Easy Rider," have savaged the venerable Electra-Glide like
tigers at a goat and herewith present to you the… Super Glide, Sonnet on
Extravagance.
Where did it come from? When was it born? According to William G. Davidson,
H-D's styling chief, some auricle in his heart was excited by pictures of a
non-produced 74 that appeared briefly in the Fifties. It had a performance, not
a touring, look, and William G. was smitten.
Add the influence of the California bob-jobs; not full choppers as such, but
lightened, leaned-down bikes that were recognizable as 74s (the Hirschberg
approach). And then, in 1968, surfaced the harbinger of today's Super Glide,
designed and built by a number of different H-D departments under Davidson's
supervision. "They (meaning the people who have the final say in these matters)
liked it, but they wouldn't definitely build it," he said last summer. They
didn't.
"As a. company, we're leery of the chopper image and any kind of extremism. With
that bike, we were also worried that it would draw sales away from the Sports-ter
and the existing 74.
"In June of 1969 we had Frank Magid and Associates run a survey for us, and the
survey showed that the Super Glide wasn't too radical nor was it too close to
our other big bikes."
The next step was a plant. Pictures of the prototype were sent to Bob Greene,
Hot Rod's motorcycle editor, for inclusion in the 1969 edition of Greene's
"Motorcycle Sport Book," and there it blossomed forth under a smokescreen of
copy intended to suggest that the bike was a private custom, not a factory
machine. "We wanted to judge public response and create a little excitement,"
Davidson said. Greene wasn't nearly cute enough. A lot of Harley-Davidson
dealers spotted it for what it was, and inquiries poured in. A nerve had been
struck: all signs pointed to immediate and overwhelming public acceptance, and
the bike stormed into production, little different in appearance from the
prototype. Except for the paint job.
"The red, white, and blue thing just sort of floated into the picture," Davidson
said of the "Sparkling America" option. True enough. Spawned by Middle America's
reaction to pressures against U.S. involvement in Vietnam, visible patriotism
(in the form of red, white and blue anything) showed up on police sleeves and
Hardhats' hard hats and automobile fenders and lapels. It also showed up on the
gas tank of Peter Fonda's chopper and on the back of Peter Fonda; a different
interpretation of what it meant, no doubt, but there nonetheless. (A shard of
irony: the people who will likely purchase a Super Glide done up in the
Sparkling America motif are the same people who hated "Easy Rider.")
Visually, the Super Glide has a lot going for and against it. Stock, Ceriani-type
Sportster front forks, among the cleanest in all of motorcycling, have been
grafted to the front of the standard Glide frame, complete with Sportster brake
assembly, Sportster wheel, Sportster headlight, and Sportster fender. The effect
is startling. Because the forks are slightly longer, and a lot leaner, than the
wide-set Giant Redwoods they replace, air-space exists between the engine and
the fender-wheel assembly, and the bike's front end has an air of rakish
delicacy that sets it apart from the bulbousness of the twin gas tanks and the
massiveness of the 1200cc engine.
The fiberglass seat/rear fender assembly will be the source of considerable
debate. Carried from just aft of the tanks to well behind the rear tire, the
seat/fender (complete with a second full inner-fender) cascades low down the
spine of the bike and competes with the huge rear tire and equally sizable
muffler. In keeping with the tanks and front fender, it is white with red and
blue accents, all horizontal, flowing, and superbly rendered. It can be argued
that such a lengthy expanse has to be broken up, and broken up it is: by the
Frenched-in taillight, by the stripes and accents, and by the three-tiered seat.
Certainly it is unsubtle. Possibly it is overdone.
No doubt about the tanks—they are gross, designed with a heavy hand, intrusive,
and they detract from the very impressive mien of the engine. They are slightly
smaller than current Glide fuel tanks (capacity: 3.5 gallons), but they are too
wide, too bottom-heavy, and what flair they may have is interrupted by the
large, centrally-mounted instrument cluster. Too, they are mounted in such a way
that parts of the rocker-boxes are hidden. Compared to the beautiful simplicity
of the front end, the tanks recall the busyness of the Fifties and the
oppressive stylistic dullness of the standard Electra-Glide. It may well have
been the aim of the designers to assert the connection between the Super Glide
and the good ol' 74; if so, one would wish the assertion had been made with a
rapier instead of a bludgeon.
In its totality,
the Super Glide is an enormous visual improvement on the 74 series. Yet for the
most part it remains in the first stage of mechanical beauty—beauty added on,
rather than designed in. At the turn of the century, when this country
discovered itself looking at its machinery as well as the work its machinery was
producing, its first reaction was to snatch up the paint can. The result was
machinery festooned and vivified with pinstripes, murals, and color. The
remnants of this artistic awareness and thrust live on in locomotive museums,
steam tractor museums, and in restored airplanes and automobiles.
Later, the design
of the machines themselves came to be regarded as beautiful, and the necessity
for paint diminished. The Super Glide demonstrates to a degree that H-D, too,
believes in the concept of unadorned, functional mechanical beauty. The exhaust
pipes, air cleaner cover, rocker boxes, forks, and timing cover, for example,
are allowed to stand on their own merit; all are well-designed, clean, and
attractive. But the impact made by the tank and seat/fender is overpowering, and
intrudes on the beauty of the bike's mechanical elements with such intensity as
to cause them to be visually ignored. Still, the Super Glide's appearance
attracts attention—lots of it—and that is at least as important as it might
seem; more to the point, it demonstrates an attempt on Harley-Davidson's part to
get into the middle of things with the 74 and a willingness to let it compete
with the motorcycles that are shaping the sport, taking a gamble in the process.
And the Super Glide is a gamble, especially in the sense that its styling is so
far out front, so uncompromisingly committed, and so… personal. Face it—the bike
looks like a custom, and a custom, by definition, is the result of a given
owner's subjecting a given machine to a given set of styling criteria: his own.
For that very reason, production motorcycles in the past have not made strong
visual statements; the bikes that have succeeded, the bikes that have left deep
tracks across the midsection of motorcycling (Triumph 650, Honda 305, recently
the Kawasaki 500), have done so on the strength of passable attractiveness,
performance, and price. A styling rule-of-thumb: walk the middle road. You may
not turn anyone on with styling, but you won't turn anyone off; thus you start
even with every other motorcycle manufacturer, no balls, no strikes, no gambles.
Into all of which bumps and grinds the Super Glide, willing to take its chances
with a picky and unpredictable public, spewing statements right and left. Vital
question: will the American motorcyclist, used to individualizing tapioca
styling if he feels like it, accept the mark of someone else's individuality;
ride around on someone else's interpretation of radical taste? Therein is the
gamble H-D is willing to take, and an admirable and brave one indeed.
Styling aside, if the bike were to make it, it would have to perform with a
vengeance. Accelerate, it does; corner, it does; stop, it does not.
The 74 engine, unaltered in the transformation from Electra-Glide to Super
Glide, continues to be one of the great power-plants in history, churning out
more than 65 ft-lbs of torque and God knows how much horsepower from 1207 cc. A
brand new 1 5/8-inch Bendix carburetor (with float bowl and accelerator pump)
replaces last year's troublesome and complex Tillotson; it breathes through the
traditional Y-manifold into a pair of lightweight aluminum cylinderheads. A
single camshaft, whose outer end times ignition, transmits valve openings and
closings through motorcycling's only hydraulic lifters.
Torque is produced by displacement, compression ratio, and breathing efficiency;
bore/stroke ratios and flywheel mass have nothing to do with it. The flywheels
in the Super Glide, though, are massive, and can store huge quantities of torque
before transmitting it smoothly through a spring-dampened compensating sprocket
and duplex chain, to what has to be the best clutch ever invented. The demands
any motorcycle makes on its clutch are relative to engine speed, total weight,
gear ratios, and available torque.
The demands the
Super Glide makes on its clutch are barbaric, especially in a drag racing
situation: a lot of torque comes at it from one end, and a lot of resistance
from the other. The result is heat, and heat kills clutches when it becomes
excessive. How much to kill the Super Glide clutch? More than could be generated
by over 25 back-to-back, full-throttle shots down the drag strip, some made
using second gear off the line. At the end of the day, the clutch demanded no
re-adjustment, refused to drag, and refused to slip. Which came as no real
surprise: the big H-D clutch assembly has long been the favorite of those who
build double-engined, high-gear-only drag machines. What is surprising is the
light pull on the clutch lever needed to disengage it–it asks for little more
effort than many lightweight trail machines.
The Super Glide's performance on the strip was frankly astonishing, aided more
than somewhat by the diminution in its weight. The removal of the electric
starter, both heavy, deeply-valenced fenders, the heavy tanks, the
automobile-sized battery, and the inclusion of the Sportster front end and the
fiberglass seat/fender have pared overall weight from 690 lbs (the weight of a
standard Electra-Glide without the King of the Highway Group) to 565 lbs, wet.
Thus relieved, the Super Glide bellowed through the quarter in 13.90 seconds at
96.25 mph. In third gear. Assuming that 96 is about as fast as it could go in
third, and assuming that it could pull maximum rpms (5750) in fourth, then the
Super Glide has, with a 24 T mainshaft sprocket, a top speed of better than 117
mph. It can go faster than that. The engine delivers peak horsepower at about
5400 rpm and maximum torque at about 3200; with taller gearing, the Super Glide
should be able to flog along at 125 or better.
tough to ride crisply. The first-to-second shift was a bitch, complicated by the
necessary heft of the transmission parts and the slop in the shifter linkage.
Due to the position and the size of the clutch, and the desired location of the
footpegs, the shifter mechanism is a bell-crank apparatus connected to the
transmission's racheting assembly by a long metal rod. Speed-shifts were
impossible; button-shifts (leave the throttle wide-open; pre-load the shifter;
fan the kill-button, and pray) were chancy and inconsistent. The second-to-third
shift was little easier to effect. Had this not been a problem, the bike could
easily have run mid-to-low thirteens at approximately 100 mph, acceleration
figures just an eye-wink away from the most intense of the Superbikes.
For the first time, the 74 frame has been tested—and found not wanting. Before,
no one really knew; the cement-footed ponderousness of the bike made hard
cornering an impossibility. Nor did it seem fair to evaluate the 74 on the same
grounds as other bikes, because it was more a two-wheeled car than a
motorcycle—ascertaining its nimbleness was always irrelevant. But the Super
Glide is a motorcycle, and it handles quite nicely. The 30 degrees of steering
head inclination, coupled with a moderate amount of trail, give it a heavy feel
at low speeds, but not so heavy that it's a bother.
And the bike leans around corners, instead of simply steering, and it leans
pretty far—far enough to scrape the bottom off the right footpeg and ground the
sidestand. The Sportster forks, loaded more heavily than they were on any
Sportster, do not flex, and they do an adequate (though noisy, and leaky) job of
absorbing any bump you are likely to encounter. As usual, the adjustable rear
shocks are canted forward—to make room, on the Electra-Glide, for saddlebags—and
they are likewise up to the task.
There's no reason, really, why the bike shouldn't handle. The heavy feel of the
front end at low speeds is compensated to some degree by the extremely low
center of gravity; while the bike is awfully long (wheelbase: 62% inches), the
frame, with a thicket of forged gussets and cross-braces, and a mammoth swingarm
pivot, is immune to flexure. Relative to a smaller bike, the Super Glide is
somewhat imprecise around fast, bumpy turns; relative to an Electra-Glide, it is
nimble as a cat. For most riders, the Super Glide can go around corners faster
than they'll want to ride it.
Here's one reason why: if you go around a corner fast you may have to stop fast,
and the Super Glide absolutely cannot do it. Its brakes are an abomination,
unworthy of either Harley-Davidson or the Super Glide. The bike flies. The bike
handles. The bike will not stop. After the first run at the drag strip any
resemblance to adequate braking faded like an echo, and it just wasn't fair.
Why? Harley-Davidson had a chance, with this bike, to meet the rest of the
superbikes face-to-face and come away smiling.
Certainly H-D has
the technical wherewithal to design and build an effective set of brakes;
certainly the Super Glide, with a weight of 565 lbs and a top speed of nearly
120 mph and a price of approximately $2200, deserves—demands good brakes. Would
an effective brake have weakened the visual appeal of the Sportster forks?
Maybe. And if that be the reason why a good front brake were excluded, then
critical function has been sacrificed for appearance, and that makes it even
worse. Of course the Sportster brake is part of the whole package; of course the
archetypal chopper has no front brake at all; of course development of a new
brake would have cost money. But look: the Super Glide lists for a solid $700
more than a Honda 750; the Sportster needs a better front brake anyway, and so
does the 74; so H-D could have killed three birds with one stone, done the
riding public a great service, and become competitive with the imports in a very
crucial area. They didn't.
The rear brake is marginal-to-satisfactory. H-D decided long ago that any kind
of mechanical apparatus linking the forward-mounted lever with the brake itself
was out of the question due to the distances involved. Hydraulics provided the
answer: the master cylinder, appended to the frame, lurking behind a totally
unnecessary chrome cover, and operated by a Goldberg linkage demanding no less
than two complete bellcrank assemblies, transmits pressure through fluid to a
slave cylinder in the rear wheel brake drum. Either the coefficient of friction
between the brake linings and the drum is inadequate; or the master cylinder
piston is too large; or the slave cylinder piston is too small. At any rate, in
order to lock the rear wheel when the brake is hot, the rider's full weight must
be brought to bear on the pedal, which means the rider has to stand up and
heave. AwkWard—especially in a situation that's about to get unpleasant.
H-D's approach to this entire brake situation is irrational. It isn't that
vital—really—to have high-performance brakes on the low-performance
Electra-Glide (although it would be nice). But if H-D wants to bring the
Super-Glide into the superbike fold they will have to play by the rules, one of
which concerns braking efficiency. To build a superbike that won't stop is just
as nonsensical as building one that won't accelerate or one that won't corner.
But superbikes, in fulfilling certain criteria, are exempt in several areas.
Evidently Harley-Davidson feels seating comfort is irrelevant. Despite its
length, the effectiveness of its suspension and the reasonable quality of its
vibration dampening, the Super Glide is uncomfortable to ride over long
distances. Rubber bushings do not effectively insulate the rider's hands from
vibration, vibration pulses up through a very hard seat to anesthetize the
rider's rear, and the left footpeg, attached to a very massive primary cover,
shakes like a palsied chicken at an indicated 60 mph; the only way to keep your
foot in place is to wedge your heel against the clutch bulge.
It was impossible to determine for whom the seating position was laid out. The
Sportster handlebars, Ionic and clean, are carried too far forward for anyone of
normal reach, the rider positioning step in the seat is too far back, and the
footpegs again, are too far forward. What do you do? You hunch, and it gets to
you after a while. Passenger seating, on the other hand, is the best around.
There's plenty of room back there, and the passenger pegs are perfectly
situated.
What does the bike do for you? How do you feel when you ride it? You feel like a
damn king is how you feel; everybody is looking at you, admiring the waves of
bravado that flood off the exterior of the Super Glide, digging the bongo-beat
rhythm of the engine. The Super Glide is turned out for a parade; subtlety never
makes it in a parade, and subtlety dares not exist on the Super Glide. Everybody
likes it; everybody has to like it, for one reason or another. Either it makes
them laugh; or turns them green with envy; or dazzles them with its great
heaving engine, or the gallant, nerveless audacity of its paint job. The Super
Glide faces you brazenly: it is what it is—massive bolts attaching massive
appurtenances to a massive frame and a seat configuration that stretches over
the horizon, the whole issue propelled along by an enthusiastic engine neither
having nor wanting any excuses.
It is terribly self-conscious, terribly extreme; it leaves itself no outs,
brooks no compromises. It starts easily (the electric starter was not missed),
runs well, doesn't leak oil, will not break, and handles more than adequately.
Visually, like it or not, the Super Glide is a dazzler, and H-D's commitment is
a dazzling commitment. With the exception of the sickening failure of the
brakes, the Super Glide is everything mechanically that it promises visually to
be; and it will succeed in this country like no machine HD has ever made or
dreamed of making.
Source Cycle 1970
Any corrections or more information on these motorcycles will be kindly appreciated.