|
Yamaha WR 400F

|
Model
|
Yamaha
WR 400F |
|
Year
|
1998 |
|
Engine
|
Lliquid cooled, four
stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valve, . Dry Sump |
|
Capacity
|
399 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
92.0
x 60.1mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
12.5:1 |
|
Induction |
Keihin
39mm FCR |
|
Ignition /
Starting |
CDI / kick |
|
Max Power |
48 hp 35.3 kW @ 8000 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
39 Nm @ 7500 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
5 Speed / chain |
|
Front Suspension |
Inverted
46mm Kayaba forks with 300mm wheel travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Monocross
Kayaba, 315mm wheel travel |
|
Front Brakes |
Single 245mm disc 4 piston caliper |
|
Rear Brakes |
Single 220mm disc 2 piston caliper |
|
Front Tyre |
80/100-21 |
|
Rear Tyre |
110/100-18 |
|
Dry-Weight |
113
kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
8
Litres |

This is the bike that re-defined our views on
four-strokes when it was released in 1998. It's a very clever piece of
engineering which is designed to make us feel and look very good indeed.
The WR400F is a direct descendant from the
YZ400F four-stroke motocrosser, which already has a World Open Motocross
Championship to its credit with Italian Andrea Bartolini, in addition to Daryl
Hurley's triumph in last year's Thumper Nationals title.
Yamaha has made some sensible modifications
to its 2000 model WR. The most significant would be the slimmer seat and tank,
which are sourced directly from the YZ426F. It does, however, reduce the fuel
capacity to 8lt, cutting things a bit fine for trail riders. Saying that, the
previous WRs have been pretty good with their fuel consumption.
The WR does retain its explosive power, which
is more akin to a two-stroke. The mid-range power hit is awesome and the motor
keeps revving and pumping out power as the revs climb. It keeps producing the
ponies past the point where you think the engine will fly to bits - that's why
expert riders love this bike so much.
It does seem difficult to get the power down
to the ground on the WR at first. It's just too easy (and enjoyable) to wind the
throttle on and get the rear wheel spinning. The rear wheel lights up easily and
steering is totally predictable.
You can the split the personality of the WR
with a bit of juggling between the throttle and the gearbox. It's hard to pick
up on a first ride, but it's quite obvious after you've accidentally bogged the
engine down at low revs a few times. A bit like going up a hill in a gear too
high - the engine is losing revs and you're opening the throttle more while your
finger is poised over the clutch. This exposes the WR's true talent for finding
grip while short-shifting the gearbox and loading up the motor. In this mode,
the WR becomes a much easier bike to ride through some of the more horrible
things you would expect to find on enduro stages.
The WR's suspension sees little in the way of
changes in 2000, although the damping is a little faster. I thought the opposite
at first; it felt like the compression damping on the forks was a bit sharper.
This is probably due to a few other changes, like the lower triple-clamp, which
is thicker and stiffer. The steering-head position has been moved back 5mm to
shorten the wheelbase too. The bike is also 2.5kg lighter, most of the weight
loss due to the smaller fuel tank.
The shock felt like a pretty good match for
the front-end and it suited my 75kg on the standard settings. The rear shock has
the high/low speed compression damping which I didn't really get a chance to
experiment with that much. Overall, the suspension - which I'd put on a par with
a YZ250 - is still firm and well suited to competition riding. The experts love
this feature while the rest of us have to ride a bit harder to appreciate how
good it can be.
One of the nicest things about the $9616 WR
is that it goes about the business of being quick in a very quiet way. The
muffler turns the bark of the exhaust to more of a choof, and it's the quietest
bike of the bunch. It mightn't sound as good as a barking exhaust, but it's
unlikely to upset the neighbours and that's a very important issue these days.
As good as the WR is, it's not the easiest
bike to start. There's no electric start option and the kickstart lever is
short. It's a difficult bike to clutch start, so you need to master the art of
using the kickstarter. Thankfully, it's not as difficult as it feels, provided
you get in a habit of winding the kick starter until it stops dead against a
12.5:1 compression ratio.
Curiously, it doesn't have a trip meter and
this might not be such a good idea with the smaller fuel tank. Maybe it's just
me being picky - I'm in a habit of using the trip meter a fair bit.
On a more positive note, this bike comes with
stuff that all enduro bikes should have: brush guards, a crossbar pad for the
handlebars and a bash plate to protect the bottom of the engine case. One
thing's for sure, it's a spectacular trail bike and a competitive enduro mount
that's sure to remain a favourite.
Source
BikePoint

|