|
Suzuki GT 250

|
Make Model |
Suzuki GT 250 |
|
Year |
1972-73 |
|
Engine |
Air cooled, two stroke, parallel twin
|
|
Capacity |
247 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
54 х 54 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
7.5:1 |
|
Induction |
|
|
Ignition /
Starting |
PEI / kick |
|
Max Power |
30 hp @ 8000 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
2.8 kg-m @ 7000 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
|
|
Front Suspension |
|
|
Rear Suspension |
|
|
Front Brakes |
Drum |
|
Rear Brakes |
Drum |
|
Front Tyre |
2.75-18 |
|
Rear Tyre |
3.00-18 |
|
Wet-Weight |
146 kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
|
The Suzuki GT250 was an evolution of the T250
Hustler. In Japan there was initially a GT250 model which was fundamentaly
unchanged from the T250. When the GT250 was released to the world it had been
modernized with a disc brake at the front and with a new Ram Air cylinder head.
Other changes were harder to detect on the surface, other than one of the
prettiest fuel tanks on a Suzuki being replaced by a "bread box." Why the
changes to a successful machine, especially since performance was not
enhanced......purely marketing.....Suzuki was keen to recoup it's investment
into the ungainly GT triple series and the GT250 was rebadged and modified to
have a family resemblance to the ram air triples. Couldn't have a superseded
technoilogy ie air cooled twins performing better than the new kids on the block
could we?
When the GT250 model was released (1971 in Japan, 1973 in Europe), it was still,
a reliable if uncompetetive machine. It was as large as many 400cc machines and
could not match the Yamaha RD250 for performance and handling. Despit this in
many countries, among them the Great Britain, it was a best selling motorcycle
until the mid seventies, possibly because it was a sweet predictable handler and
still retained Suzuki's famous capacity for reliability and durability. The
follow-up 250 to the GT250 was the X-& which was a different kettle of fish
altogether.....quite skittish and fragile in comparison.
The T250 had a slightly more powerful engine than the GT250. Pollution and noise
regulations of the tiome required Suzuki to redesign the exhausts which reduced
performance a tad. |