|
Suzuki GSX 1200

|
Make Model |
Suzuki GSX 1200 |
|
Year |
1998 |
|
Engine |
Air/oil cooled, four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC,
4 valves per cylinder. |
|
Capacity |
1157 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
79 x 59 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
9.5:1 |
|
Induction |
4x Keihin CVK32 |
|
Ignition /
Starting |
Digital electronic / electric |
|
Max Power |
100 hp 74 kW @ 8500 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
98 Nm @ 4500 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
5 Speed / chain |
|
Front Suspension |
43mm Inverted tube telescopic, coil spring,
oil damped, |
|
Rear Suspension |
Swingarm type, coil spring, gas/oil damped,
spring preload 5-way adjustable, compression damping force 4-way adjustable |
|
Front Brakes |
2x 310mm discs 4 piston calipers |
|
Rear Brakes |
Single 240mm disc 2 piston caliper |
|
Front Tyre |
120/70 ZR17 |
|
Rear Tyre |
170/60 ZR17 |
|
Dry-Weight |
210 kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
18 Litres |
|
Consumption average |
17.8 km/lit |
|
Standing
¼ Mile |
11.3 sec |
|
Top Speed |
221.4 km/h |
|
Overview |
Sport Rider /
Motormag |

Kawasaki ZRX1200 vs Suzuki Bandit 1200S vs Yamaha FZ1
Back in the Motorcycle Dark Ages, before market
segmentation gave us stiletto-sharp sportbikes, station wagon-sized touring rigs
and chrome-laden cruisers, the owner of a motorcycle determined what niche it
fit into. If a rider had a sporting bent, lower bars and rearsets were added.
Tourers received windshields and bags. Old timers often recall this era of the
Universal Japanese Motorcycle (UJM) with more than a bit of rose-colored tint.
Yes, you could do it all on a UJM, but you can roost better on a sportbike,
superslab better on a tourer and pose better on a cruiser than you could on any
ol' UJM.
Still, enough riders crave the UJM--or standards, as we prefer to call
them--that the manufacturers began to see them as another niche market. While
true standards are bare-bones motorcycles with no fairings, luggage, racer ergos
or other items that might force them into another category, we at Sport Rider
have been watching the birth of another class within the standards category.
Super standards offer the traditional riding position of a standard, yet step
beyond the minimalist, naked bike. These machines can don a coat and tie during
the week, but given a chance, they'll shake off the business clothes, enabling
you to ride like a hero on the weekends. And you don't need to use your X-ray
vision to see the engines.
When super standards are compared to standards, such as the Honda Nighthawk 750
or Buell XI, the similarities and differences are immediately visible. But super
standards are more than just a standard with a half fairing. They need to
provide a little something extra while still offering the flexibility (and
customizability) of standards and the UJMs of old. In this comparison of the
Kawasaki ZRX1200, the Suzuki Bandit 1200S and the Yamaha FZ1, two of the bikes
are clearly super standards while one misses out on that little something extra
to differentiate itself from the modern-day UJMs.
The plain truth
A quick once-over glance at these bikes (and their spec sheets) gives the
initial impression that they have quite a lot in common. And they do. Take a
gander at the frames; no aluminum perimeter frames or engine cases acting as
swingarm pivots here. Double cradle tubular steel construction is the norm. The
FZ1 wins the thicker-is-better award for frame backbone tube diameter with a
48.6mm diameter. The ZRX steps up with 42.7mm, and the Bandit with 37.0mm. The
payoff of the stoutness is additional rigidity. In our canyon thrashes, only the
Bandit displayed the slightest bit of flex--nothing bad, just noticeable. The
trio's rake figures are similar--with the Bandit and ZRX measuring 25 degrees
while the FZ1 stretches out a tick further at 26 degrees. Additionally, you
won't find any high-tech inverted forks on these bikes. All make do with beefy
43mm traditional forks to keep their front wheels in-line. Again the Kawasaki
and Yamaha differentiate themselves from the Suzuki with their fully adjustable
front ends--although the Bandit sports a cartridge fork and preload adjustment
only. Expect the same type of breakdown in the rear suspenders. The FZ1 and the
ZRX get units with all the bells and whistles (except ride height
adjustment)--the Kawi with its two piggyback shocks and the Yamaha solo unit
with a reservoir. The Bandit wears a non-reservoir shock with preload and
rebound controls.
Similarly, the engines powering these motorcycles range from distant relatives
to siblings of their manufacturers' current sporting machinery. The Bandit's
engine traces its lineage to the early GSX-R line--those with the air/oil
cooling. Add some current-tech ignition trickery, like a throttle positioning
sensor, and a bullet-proof 1157cc powerplant with a known history of
hot-rod-ability. The ZRX only reaches down as far as the ZX-11 on its family
tree for motor-vation. Remember when this engine powered the King of the Hill in
the top-speed wars? For 2001, the ZRX's 112cc displacement bump puts the
Kawasaki at the top of our trio in capacity. While the FZ1 may be the pip-squeak
of the bunch with a mere 998cc, the retuned YZF-R1 engine delivers a punch that
easily can level the playing field with a twist of the throttle.
Multi-tools
By virtue of being broadly focused motorcycles, this trio is as versatile as a
Leatherman. Need a knife to slice through the twisties? No problem. What about a
can opener to deal with those cages on the morning commute? These bikes have the
ability to perform a variety of tasks because they lack the specialization of
other classes of motorcycles. Consequently, we were impressed with how easily
they acquitted themselves to the situations we tested them in.
The urban jungle can play hell on riders of narrowly focused sportbikes.
Remember what we've written about almost every iteration of Ducati superbikes?
Super standards, on the other hand, live for the city. All of these bikes leap
off the line with authority. The FZ1 is the quickest with the ZRX right behind
until approximately 50 mph, where the FZ1 takes off, but don't rule out the
Bandit. The Suzuki makes up for its comparative lack of jam by having the
easiest to modulate throttle. In the roll-on, hold it neutral, roll it off and
then back on world of the evening bump and grind, this feature pays more
dividends than just snapping off the line. Of course, weight also plays a factor
in directional changes--both forward and side-to-side. The Yamaha, with its
light weight, not only launches quicker, but also feels a bit more maneuverable.
On Main Street, where situations can change in the blink of an eye, being able
to change lines or slow down immediately pays big dividends. The ZRX feels like
the smallest of the bikes, thanks to the short reach to the bar afforded by the
narrow, classically styled tank. So, even though the ZRX weighs 30 pounds more
than the FZ1, it can turn almost as quickly. The Bandit, despite having the
shortest wheelbase by almost one inch, feels the longest and steers slower than
the others.
In the whoa department, the FZ1 also reigns supreme with the most powerful
brakes of the trio. The progressiveness of the Yamaha's four-piston calipers
makes it easy to generate the braking force to stay out of trouble. While the
ZRX's six-piston calipers provide enough friction to slow the bike briskly, the
extremely linear nature of the power delivery makes panic stops an arm-pumping
affair. Again, the Bandit comes up short in comparison to the others. Initial
application of the brake lever is soft and the overall feel of the Suzuki's
braking is spongy--not that it does anything wrong. Just when you need to stop
right now, the Bandit adds a little vagueness to the mix.
Get outta town
Beyond Gotham, on the open road--the wide, flat, straight kind--only one of
these bikes' fairings didn't leave us wanting, particularly in windy conditions.
The Bandit offers the most realistic weather protection and roomiest ergos of
the bunch. Factor in a comfy pillion that isn't too high (which makes some
passengers more at ease than being perched above the rider), and the Suzuki
would be a great mount for racking up the miles. While the ZRX's little bikini
fairing gives respectable wind protection despite its diminutive size, we were a
bit battered by headwinds on the Kawasaki. Folks who plan to travel on the FZ1
will most likely want to pop for the Yamaha Accessories windscreen that stands
two inches taller than the stocker. (A six-inch version is in development.) Over
the long haul, our certified SR passenger found the Bandit to be her favorite
with the ZRX a close second--although she rated all three bikes as comfortable.
But super standards aren't about the super slab. Get these machines on a twisty
road, and things start to happen. All three bikes have decent ground clearance.
Thanks to the forward riding position, the Kawasaki feels the most responsive to
handlebar inputs. However, that quick steering can turn into bump steering if
pavement irregularities are encountered while the front is loaded under
deceleration. Although this sapped some confidence on corner entries, the ZRX
made up for this shortcoming with easy to modulate brakes, allowing precise
control of entry speed. The Suzuki felt ponderous and slow steering by
comparison. The minimally adjustable suspension exhibited an overall stiffness.
The Bandit also wanted to stand up on the brakes. Combine this with high effort
binders and you need to work pretty hard to keep up with the pack. Even after
the brakes had some heat (we could actually feel them coming in as they warmed),
one tester said that he was slowing with four fingers (instead of his usual two)
at times. The FZ1 is the softest sprung of the bunch, yet this didn't keep it
from being the easiest to ride. Neutral steering coupled with the powerful,
progressive brakes (that required less pressure than the other two bikes) made
the Yamaha a pleasure to hustle along. The primary limitation was its soft
suspenders that let the FZ drag earlier than the others. A couple testers also
felt that the riding position was a bit too close to sit-up-and-beg and needed a
slightly lower bar.
In the tight stuff, the Bandit's soft power delivery worked in its favor.
Rolling on the throttle produced buttery smooth motivation regardless of where
in the corner the volume was turned up. The FZ1 and ZRX both required a more
careful throttle hand. While the FZ1 was responsive to the point of being
snappy--or just a hair overly eager--the ZRX was abrupt when shifting from off
throttle to on. Although a careful rider could get smooth acceleration from the
FZ1, the ZRX preferred to have the throttle moving in a positive direction
before entering a corner. In less cramped confines, the differences might not
have been as noticeable since faster, more sweeping corners would de-emphasize
side-to-side transitions and better mask abrupt off/on throttles.
Back on the straight and speedy, the FZ1's clutch and tranny won high praise.
While the ZRX1100 felt like it needed a sixth gear, the upgraded 1200 never felt
as if a gear was lacking. Five gears also suited the Bandit, but its
acceleration was clearly muted in comparison to the Kawasaki and Yamaha.
The wrap up
These three motorcycles can do almost anything you'd ask of sporting machinery
and a few things you might be afraid of asking harder-nosed bikes. But which of
these super standards works best? That depends. Strictly by the numbers, the FZ1
rules the class. Hands down. However, the ZRX is close in enough important
categories that it ranks on the heels of the Yamaha. Unfortunately, the Bandit
doesn't measure up in several places, putting it in the difficult position of
straddling the line between standard and super standard. As it stands right now,
the Suzuki doesn't offer that little something extra that we expect from a super
standard.
SR Opinions
One of my favorite bikes that has been through the SR shop was the
124-horsepower Project Z-ReX (October '99), built from a Kawasaki ZRX1100.
Needless to say, I was looking forward to the ZRX1200 and expected it to be
everything our project bike was. Imagine my dismay, however, to find that the
ZRX has lost its appeal to me. It could be that the swingarm pivot was loose and
I was still wary after tightening it. Or maybe it's that the engine overpowers
the stock chassis a bit too easily now.Another one of my favorite bikes was
Motorcyclist's Bandit 1200, a test bike I hogged a lot last summer. But our bike
just doesn't seem the same for some reason. It feels slower than I remember, and
the suspension doesn't work as nicely. Maybe it's because we just finished
testing 600s and open-class bikes, and these bikes simply don't do it for me
anymore.But I think the real reason that the ZRX and Bandit have lost some of
their shine is sitting down in the shop right now, and the key is in my
pocket--the FZ1. You just can't argue with the R1-based engine and how light the
Yamaha is--although the Kawasaki and Suzuki do an admirable job trying. Now that
Yamaha has upped the ante with a recent-generation motor though, I can't stop
thinking that someone has to step in with a stiff chassis and inverted fork
soon. Hmm, project FZR1, maybe?
--Andrew Trevitt
Wow, add a third bike to a class, and suddenly you can do a comparison instead
of single tests. Funny thing is that if tested individually, the Suzuki might
have fared better. Although it's down on power compared to the last unit we
rode, the Bandit's problems really show in this company. A few aftermarket
refinements, and the 1200S would be right there with the others, though.The
standout in this group has to be the FZ1. It plain dominates this gathering when
all-out performance is considered. Although the ZRX makes more power throughout
the bulk of the rpm range, the FZ1 feels faster in accelerating, turning and
stopping. You'd be hard pressed to find a more balanced motorcycle on the
market.Even with such a strong competitor in the FZ1, I'd still buy the ZRX if I
were laying out my hard-earned cash. Everything about the bike rubs me the right
way. I love the retro styling. The riding position is perfect. And around town,
the engine can't be beat for in-your-face, bad-boy acceleration. Get it in the
twisties and the fun-o-meter stays off the scale. Yeah, the wind protection
isn't that great for the long haul, but sometimes you have to suffer for
love.Last night, my wife asked me what bike I'd ridden home. I smiled and
replied, "The bike I'm gonna get arrested on."
--Evans Brasfield
I used to look at these "standard" bikes as just that--somewhat boring, sterile,
stripped-down, pseudo-sportbikes. Not only stripped of bodywork, but also
performance. With the possible exception of the Bandit, none of the bikes in the
past really had the power that their overall appearance would have you expect,
and I was often left a bit disappointed.However, the new FZ1 and ZRX12 change
all that. Finally, some balls to back up the brawny looks, especially with the
ZRX; the old 1100 just didn't have the jam when you wicked it up (unless you
stuck in some ZX-11 cams, etc., like we did).That said, it really was tough for
me to choose between the three. The Bandit's decent enough for backroad
scratching as is, and the numb brakes could be fixed with aftermarket pads.
Lowering the front end would cure its heavy steering, and its carburetion off of
closed throttle is the least abrupt of the three bikes.But when it really comes
down to swooping through some twisty pavement, I gotta go with Yamaha's FZ1. Its
steering feel and lithe handling inspire more confidence than the ZRX, and
although the Kawasaki isn't as softly sprung as the FZ1, the Yamaha's balanced
chassis lets you drag hard parts without worry. Cool. When I get old (ha!), jus'
gimme an FZ1, some soft luggage and I'm set.
--Kent Kunitsugu

|