|
Suzuki GS 1100G

|
Make Model |
Suzuki GS 1100G |
|
Year |
1982 |
|
Engine |
Air cooled, four stroke, transverse four
cylinder, DOHC, 2 valves per cylinder |
|
Capacity |
1074 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
72 x 66 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
8.8:1 |
|
Induction |
4x 28mm Mikuni VM 28 SS carbs. |
|
Ignition /
Starting |
Transistorized / electric |
|
Max Power |
94 hp 68.6 KW @ 8000
rpm |
|
Max Torque |
86 kg-m @ 6500 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
5 Speed / shaft |
|
Front Suspension |
Telehydraulic forks |
|
Rear Suspension |
Swinging arm forks with adjustable shock absorbers. |
|
Front Brakes |
2x 295mm discs |
|
Rear Brakes |
Single
295mm disc |
|
Front Tyre |
3.50
V19 |
|
Rear Tyre |
4.50 V17 |
|
Wet-Weight |
247
kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
20
Litres |
|
Consumption average |
46 mp/g |
|
Standing
¼ Mile |
11.8 sec / 108 mp/h |
|
Top Speed |
169 km/h 128 mp/h |

Source MCN of 1982
SUZUKI'S biggest shaft-drive
machine - the GS1 1 00G - is the lazy man's tourer. Like a two-wheeled
Cadillac, the big four-pot cruiser demands no more than fuel in the tank in
return for a guarantee that it will make the going easy — and the coming
back.
The bike seems to speak to the rider: "Sit back, open the throttle and
relax. We'll be there in no time." With 92 horses and dynamo-smooth torque
on tap, the suzuki makes easy work not only of pulling its own 550lb and
five gallons of fuel, but carrying people and luggage as well.
In one easy move, engineers have added a few important millimetres to the
70 x 64.8 bore and stroke of the GS1 000 engine to give the extra torque to
tackle the weight. While it looks similar, it shares no common engine
components with the 1,000cc shaftie: crankcases, crankshaft and cylinder
head all bear different part numbers, as do the slightly modified camshafts.
The 34mm Mikuni carburettors are the same diameter as those feeding the 1
6 valve GSX1 100 motor, but the internals are different.
Interchangeable with the 1000 are the secondary gear set on the end of the
gearbox and the final drive assembly.
But even the ignition has undergone a change to reduce problems. While
the GS1000G has mechanically advanced ignition, the 1 100 relies on
electronics to complement its transistorised sparking system.
Brute bhp is down compared to the muscular GSX1100, but the softer tuned
shaftie developes a little more torque at slightly higher rpm.
The effect of Suzuki's tuning exercise has been to smooth out the power
curves so that the multi delivers an avalanche of grunt from 2,000rpm to the
8,000rpm red line.
This will endear it to those lazy riders. A weekend's touring on a
variety of roads showed how effortlessly the GS covers the miles.
Loaded with a pillion and camping luggage, the tourer felt just as easy to
control as it did solo, with plenty of engine flexibility from trickling
speeds near tickover.
So flexible was it, that the gear ratios seemed artifically low. On
twisting country roads, top gear could pull the weighty beast out of corners
from as low as 30mph.
Gearchanging was unnecessary. We simply drifted along with a touch of
brake, a whiff of throttle, content to know that traffic could be overtaken
with speed and safety after a couple of snicks on the gear pedal.
On such roads the riding position felt a little strange to a newcomer -
with the semi-flat 'bars a good stretch away from the seat. But this
made a lot of sense while blasting down the A45. It forced me to lean hard
into the gale behind my tank bag.
As with all unfaired superbikes, wind resistance can be a pain in the
neck, but at least this riding position takes the strain out of a bit of
illegal enthusiasm.
Suzuki seem to have their seat design well sorted out - thank heavens.
It's wide, well padded, long enough for two people without becoming
over-intimate. And there's a grab rail. One minor criticism from my
pillion was that the footrest height was a little too tall for her. It's
likely to be OK for smaller ladies.
There's a black mark for the rear view mirrors. Vibration blurred them
between 70-80mph. Just at the sort of speeds when riders are likely to use
them most frequently.
But vibration was no problem to the rider through most of the speed
range. It began to tingle at the top end, but then few people are likely to
spend long at 120mph-plus.
With this chassis/suspension set-up, Suzuki have stayed with tried and
tested designs. A conventional frame holds a pair of forks which
feature adjustable springs- in common with all the shaft drive Suzies.
The only problem was that the handlebars obscured the adjuster! Basically,
the adjustment is made in a similar way to Yamaha's system - a screwdriver
slot can be turned to select four different spring pre-load positions.
These adjusters are located behind push-fit plastic caps on the top of
each fork leg, but they were a little too close to the 'bars.
A pity they were not as easy to adjust as the damper controls on the
forks of the GSX -simple knobs by the spindle.
There's no fiddling about with air pressure in order to balance the front
suspension with the rear. It's often more important to get this balance
right in orderto get the handling right rather than simply stiffening both
ends.
I felt the Suzuki handled best when on medium-to-soft springing, but with
the rear dampers set on the hard side of the four positions.
Given the fact that the 1 1 00 is likely to be a beast of burden one weekend and a back road scratcher the next, this
suspension tuning is essential for the serious rider.
Just one handling fault remained beyond reach of this adjustment - a
tendency for the bike to weave slightly at around 90mph.
This side-to-side oscillation was never felt at all while two-up.
For a machine which is basically a big bore multi in the modern mould, the
1100 has a fair helping of character. It was easy to get to like it.
The only crazy thing about this bike is that it's so similar to Suzuki's own
1,000 and 850cc tourers. It's great to be spoilt for choice, but the 850 at
£700 less sure does look attractive. TS.
Source MCN of 1982 |