Honda CBX 550F




Make Model

Honda CBX 550F




Four stroke, transverse four cylinders, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.


572 cc / 34.9 cu-in
Bore x Stroke 59.2 x 52 mm
Cooling System Air cooled
Compression Ratio 9.5:1


4x 30mm Keihin CV carburettors


Starting Electric

Max Power

65 hp / 47.4 kW @ 10000 rpm

Max Torque

49 Nm / 36.1 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm


6 Speed 
Final Drive Chain
Frame Duplex cradle; tubular steel

Front Suspension

Air assisted telescopic forks, with anti-dive
Rear Suspension Pro-link air assisted shocks
Front Brakes 2x 230mm discs 2 piston caliper

Rear Brakes

Single 230mm disc

Front Tyre


Rear Tyre

Dimensions Lenth 2085 mm / 82.0 in
Width 740 mm / 29.1 in
Height 1080 mm / 40.5 in
Wheelbase 1380 mm / 54.3 in
Seat Height 785 m / 30.9 in

Dry Weight

184 kg / 406 lbs

Fuel Capacity

17 Litres / 4.4 US gal

The Honda CBX550F is a four-stroke, in line four cylinder, sport tourer motorcycle produced from 1982 to 1986 by the Honda Motor Company. The CBX550F II is identical apart from the addition of a half-fairing.

Although the model was designated 550, the actual capacity was 572.5 cc (34.94 cu in). Honda developed a completely new, unusual design of engine to compete in the middleweight-sector with twin overhead camshafts acting on rockers, having screw-adjusters for clearance which actuated the sixteen valves (four per cylinder).

The engine featured a standard oil-cooler and a distinctive, unusual exhaust system, a first for Honda, with cross-over pipes directly in front of the engine linking cylinders one to four and a separate pair of pipes connecting cylinders two and three. The CV carburettors were of a new type using mixture-enriching internal fuel passages for cold-starts, with careful engineering of the inlet tracts to achieve smooth gasflow.

The machine was noted for its use of inboard ventilated disc brakes, the discs themselves being contained within a "drum" type enclosure. Front suspension was by oil-damped telescopic fork with air assistance and incorporating an anti-dive mechanism in the left fork leg. Rear suspension was by Honda's own "Pro-Link" rising rate system, which allows the suspension forces to vary in accordance with rear wheel movement. The machine was equipped with transistorised ignition and electrics were 12 volt.


Honda's CBX550 has no conflict of roles: it was built from the ground upi to be a sports bike. Dave Calderwood indulges in a little TT-mania... a// in the course of duty as a tester, of course was now, at last, okay to reflect upon a mad day. Occasionally, all hell breaks i loose on Bike's normally laidback organisation (huh!) and usually it's when j there's a tight deadline to be met plus some other fantastically attractive incentive. Add in the Isle of Man TT week and, boy, you've gotta total freak out. To make sure that the Honda CBX550 was here, between my legs heading up to Heysham to embark aboard the midnight boat, was a masterpiece of careful; manipulation — not too obvious so the others would realise they were being edged away from the CBX but enough to deliver it at 9am to Mike the Designer's home. Back to my garage and load up a GPz750 and XT550 onto the works trailer, sling my

TT stuff into the boot of the towing car and discover that the over-trousers of my most waterproof riding suit are back in the office. Definitely can't go to the Isle of Man without those... a little later, JR arrives with the suit and asks for the photos of the feature I'd written ... jeez! If I'd left without handing those over there definitely would've been trouble. At last, an hour behind schedule and still with no breakfast other than acrid coffee inside me, I'm into the car, off round the South Circular and up the M1. Exit at the Nuneaton turnoff and a further 20-odd miles to MIRA where Roland Brown is waiting with the CBX . .. relief. We did our usual tests on all three bikes, getting very worried at the high speed antics of the XT550 on its trail bike tyres and a bit disappointed with a maximum of 118mph from the CBX. Finally, just after 2pm and with storm clouds darkening the sky (Typical! It's TT-time for sure), I pulled on the oversuit and headed northwards across the Midlands for the M6, leaving Roland to have his first outing driving the works car and too-wide trailer. At least the radio works . . .
Such hassles were forgotten now with a cool one-twenty indicated and, remarkably, enjoyed without the usual neck-straining and helmet-buffeting you associate with such speed. Suddenly the concept of 550cc replacing 750cc or more which I'd so airily dismissed when testing Kawasaki's GPz550 ('Head-banging Scratchers', Bike, June '82) seemed credible. My complaint about the GPz was its exposed riding position and too far forward footrests; while it's an excellent sports bike that'll do, everything most people want, it couldn't be considered a full blown tourer as well — the top half of your body gets too windblown for continued roadburning in excess of 90mph. But this semi-faired CBX Honda ... whew!

The glass fibre fairing fitted to the CBX is securely mounted with a similar rigid structure of tubes to that employed on its bigger 900F2 and CBX1000 stablemates. Fortunately, it's a lot smaller than those two bulky items, being only a couple of inches out from either side of the instruments and widening to encompass the petrol tank. The flip-up edge to the tinted screen ensures that just enough windblast is tipped over your head to make ton-up cruising totally effortless (apart, that is, from the nagging worry about the Old Bill: 'Blimey, I can't get away with this speed all the way up the M6I).

Mirrors on the F2 version of the CBX have been moved from the handlebars of the unfaired bike and stick out on stems mounted through the screen to the sub-frame underneath. Engine vibes don't affect them too badly but they're far too narrow to be of any use whatsoever. They extend as far out as the switchgear — great for examining the fly cemetries on each arm. Apart from long-legged riders' knees catching the rear edge of the fairing, the whole bike is ex-, tremely comfortable, especially considering it's so small.

 The dual seat is plenty big enough for two though, as seems fashionable now, the footrests are mounted high to clear the silencers and consequently a passenger sits scrumped up. A rubber covered grab rail will comfort them a bit, I guess. A knob inside the fairing adjusts the headlamp beam without recourse to tools and it's a powerful though not stunning illuminator. Rear lamp has two bulbs, useful when one blows at midnight on a motorway miles from anywhere.

The footrests, too, are mounted well back and high — as much to ensure good ground clearance as give the right leaning forward riding stance. For this is one motorcycle that's slung low. Seat height is a mere 29 inches when measured without a rider on board. Add 1601b of beer gut and it compresses a bit more, naturally. Sitting astride the CBX with both feet flat on the deck and knees bent, you instantly realise just how small and close to the ground this CBX is. It's as unlike its six-cylinder name-sharer in this respect as it could possibly be. It's also short with a wheelbase of just under 55 inches making the whole package quick to respond to rider input. In other words, when you're halfway round the 32nd Milestone on the TT circuit and you've just realised it wasn't where you thought you were, instead of blindly panicking and stuffing the marker posts on the other side of the road you can lift the bike upright, snatch on the brakes and lay it down again. Or something like that. Fortunately, these good handling traits make it easier to get your line right in the first place: I've never before got the Gooseneck (an uphill sharp right with a permanent audience) so perfect as on the CBX, flat in second and with road to spare.

The 550 is basically a hot version of a CBX400 available only (so far) in Japan. An amazing 62 horses can be wrung out at 10,000rpm, so Honda claim, which in a bike weighing 433lb with a gallon of fuel gives a power to weight ratio better than most 750s. It's even ahead of that King of the Street Racers, Yamaha's RD350LC. With max power coming just 1200rpm short of the redline, and with max torque also set pretty high in the rev band you'd be forgiven for expecting the CBX to be as peaky and unpredictable in its delivery as a Manx pub on a Sunday. True, most of the real stomp comes above six grand — there's a bit of a lull at five grand which needs steaming through — but it'll also chug along at tickover and accelerate in top with hardly a trace of transmission snatch. It won't respond with this load as lively as it does when it's on full honk but the fact that it's possible to cruise steadily without recourse to all of the six well-spaced ratios is reassuring.
One of the reasons for this spread of smooth power is, like the GPz550, that the CBX is fitted with the latest generation of CV carbs which minimise interruptions to flow through the intake tract. Instead of using an air cut-off for cold starting there's a separate jet and air passage for the choke which measures an additional richening mixture. It certainly works: obviously June in a heatwave isn't going to make cold starting much of a hassle but certainly you could ride away instantly with no power hiccups. That exhaust system, though it looks as if it ties gas flow in knots before releasing it, links cylinders 1 & 4 and 2 & 3, then has a balancer pipe set well back between the remaining pipes: it's claimed to improve low and mid range torque.

If you really hang onto the throttle and keep a careful eye on the tacho — plus coordinated limbs around gearlever and clutch — then the CBX'II go in a way that has even the average rider thinking about going proddy racing. Certain clubs have events regulated to Formula Two capacities (600cc four-strokes v 350cc two-strokes) and imagine a race full of GPz550s, CBXs, Ducati Pantah 600s and RD350LCs .. . imagine the close dices, the carnage, the happy spare parts dealers.

This kind of extreme behaviour doesn't come for free though. To keep down the weight of the motor and size of the crank-cases, Honda have opted for a sump of only 2.6 pints with a six row oil cooler neatly mounted below the fairing giving much needed assistance. Service intervals call for an oil change every 2000 miles (admittedly cheap with only this volume) and a new filter every 4000. Other items are relatively easy: ignition is fully electronic including the advance/retard, carbs are CVs which basically means Don't Touch except for balancing throttle slides, air filter is easily got at, and tappet clearance is by good ol' threaded adjuster.

These require inspection every 4000, according to the manual, and replace the bucket and shims of the original CBX-6. Apparently, the Japs intended dealers to operate an exchange service on shims— not just for bikes they serviced but also to DIYers — but that just hasn't happened widely enough. Either the dealers didn't get the mesage or they're being just plain unscrupulous in selling new (and not cheap) shims each time adjustment is needed.
Fast 'n' furious riding also results in pretty hefty fuel consumption. The overall figure in the Checkout panel does include a lot of miles on the Island, plus high speed thrashings up and down various motorways and cross-country A-roads, so more reasonable use might bump it up a bit. But there's no doubt that this bike was meant for such enthusiastic use and on several such occasions tankfuls came and went at a mere 34mpg.

That's similar to Ridden Hard figures for the GPz550 and also the RD350LC. Trouble is, sitting behind that fairing you just don't suffer the same fatigue as on those other bikes so you're tempted to go everywhere flat through the gears. There's a certain amount of vibration finding its way through the 'bars even though the solid knobs at each end are supposed to damp tingles out: engine mounts are solid to the frame — in the interests of rigidity, I suspect, on such a pure sports bike.
Kawasaki set a pretty difficult standard for anyone to reach with their super handling 550 (unlike the GPz750, tested elsewhere this ish) but the CBX is at least as good in coping with bumpy stretches though with a three inches shorter wheelbase, it isn't so stable. The Kawasaki feels rock steady save for a slight steering twitch when rolling the throttle off at around 40mph. The CBX has that 'I'm ready to turn when you are' edgy feel. It's supremely manoeuvrable in town, thanks to that seat and consequent low centre of gravity, and just slightly insecure on fast sweepers. Going round the TT course with photographer Don Morley, we stopped at various corners on the Mountain including Windy and Keppel Gate. Windy is very fast and open so you can see everything on the approach and exit. It's also smooth and perfectly surfaced requiring lots nerve to take anywhere near the limit. The CBX was immaculate through there. Mind you, I had pumped up the rear single air assisted shock over its supposed maximum of 50psi and the linked forks to lOpsi.
Over the staccato ripples of Keppel Gate, the suspension was tested more severely and came through with hardly a nudge off line. Aiding this secure feel on a dodgy surface were the fat, low profile tyres squatting on wide rims. Quite simply, they're the best Bridgestones I've ever ridden on and, with this bike at least, on a par with the current best from Europe. It'd be interesting to try something like the latest Metzelers on the bike, just to see if there is more to come in the way of roadholding, but there's no doubt that Japanese manufacturers have woken up to European tyre needs.

Honda achieve their Rising Rate monoshock rear suspension completely dif-fently from Kawasaki's Uni-Trak. Whereas Uni-Trak squeezes a conventional coil spring shock absorber from both ends via two independent systems of levers and rocker arms, on the CBX Pro-Link a pair of arms from each side of the extruded alloy swing arm operate onto the bottom of the shock only, with supporting connecting rods to the frame. The top of the shock is fixed to the frame top tube behind the petrol tank. No adjustment for damping force is provided, unlike with Uni-Trak, and to alter 'spring preload' there's an air compartment within the shock to back up the main coil spring (shrouded so it looks as though it's an air shock alone). Honda's system doesn't have as much range as Uni-Trak in increasing the stiffness of the suspension under compression so you have either to pump up the shock to cope with the worst bottoming and therefore suffer over ripples, or go for a compromise.

While it doesn't offer as good suspension as Uni-Trak, it is still pretty damn impressive though the test bike would lose a couple of psi overnight. It's easier to adjust preload than on many monoshocks and it's possible to clip on an S&W air pump without removing the right sidepanel. Which is just as well: production line economies have made items such as plastic sidepanels extremely fragile and tacky. Our CBX test bike came with Quickly Detachable locating knobs — unlike the GPz550 which at least has a coupla metal screws as well and I've seen another CBX on the road with the same sidepanel missing, presumed squashed.

For sure though, the wheels ain't QD. Wheel design is fine — attractive and rigid rolled alloy items which are a progression of the old Comstars but the enclosed disc brakes are a hangover from another age. Quite responsibly, Honda R&D obviously set more than one team working on the problem of disc brake lag in the wet when it was a serious worry for European riders in the seventies. The solution which has now been adopted by most manufacturers including Honda on other models is simple: add metal content to the disc pads. Any engineer will tell you that the simplest solution to a mechanical problem is always best.

Honda's other R&D team tackled it by trying to protect pads and rotors from getting wet in the first place, an idea mooted by lots of people originally but one which was not easy to do because of the heat generated. But since they'd invented such a device Honda decided to add it as one more USP (Unique Selling Point as the marketing men say). Pity. It's not just the time it takes to remove the wheel though that's bad enough. It took me two hours to remove and replace the front wheel when all I wanted to do was inspect the construction of the brake and find out how it worked. Even trained Honda mechanics can only get it down to one hour 20 minutes so it wasn't just my hamfisted wrenching. And contrary to what you might have read elsewhere (why?) the tubeless tyres fitted don't make punctures any less likely, just less dangerous when they do happen since deflation is slower.

No, the only point in fitting such a brake would be if it offered improved braking over currently available set-ups — and it doesn't. In fact, under repeated heavy braking at the test track the front unit faded until it was possible to pull the lever back to the bar. Such ferocious stopping isn't commonplace on the road, of course, but more telling was comparing it with the GPz750 tested at the same session. That bike, weighing 531b more and travelling at 126mph, stopped in a shorter distance than the CBX from 118mph. Same rider, same conditions.

All this isn't to say it's a bad brake: under normal road use and even near panic crash stops when confronted with a TT wally, it coped adequately. It's just that there's an easier solution — metal pads.
Two of the enclosed brakes are used at the front and one at the rear, both operated by hydraulics. Two scoops on each brake plate, plus vents in the outer hub ring, force cooling air onto the rotor and calipers but obviously not enough. Larger vents would probably allow in too much water in the wet so... back to Square One. Fortunately, it's not such a problem to check or change the pads: that's just three bolts holding on that hub cover, one securing Allen bolt and they pull straight out. The mechanical anti-dive device is only on the left fork leg and when set on the hardest of the four settings, a lopsided twitch is definitely noticeable despite the cast alloy brace going across the top of the mudguard.

Unusually for a Japanese middleweight, the CBX often surprises you with 1) how fast you're travelling and 2) how far you've travelled. Number 2 happens most often when the petrol tank goes onto reserve, a reasonable 3/4-gallon, at around 100-115 miles. That's not enough for such a bike and it's irritating to have to stop so often if you've real distance to cover. But otherwise the CBX comes across as a well thought-out motorcycle leaving would-be riders in only one quan-dry: CBX or GPz or RD350LC? Assuming you're a four-stroke fan and it's a straight choice between GPz or CBX, the Honda's excellent fairing and small size would win me over. However, it's easy enough to fit a fairing and then the GPz's slightly better rear suspension, bucket and shim tappet adjustment and 'ordinary' disc brakes would take the advantage. Heck, it's just too close to make judgements over trivia such as colour schemes or switchgear an' all that stuff. I guess we'll just have to envy those in a position to go for either.

Source bike Magazine 1982