|
Make Model |
BSA A65 Firebird SS |
|
Year |
1970 |
|
Engine |
Air cooled, four stroke, parallel twin, OHV, 2 valve per cylinder. |
|
Capacity |
654 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
75 x 74 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
9.0:1 |
|
Induction |
|
|
Ignition /
Starting |
Twin coil / kick |
|
Max Power |
49 hp 35.8 KW @ 7000 rpm |
|
Max Torque |
|
|
Transmission /
Drive |
4 Speed / chain |
|
Front Suspension |
|
|
Rear Suspension |
|
|
Front Brakes |
Drum |
|
Rear Brakes |
Drum |
|
Front Tyre |
3.25-19 |
|
Rear Tyre |
4.00-18 |
|
Dry-Weight |
|
|
Fuel Capacity |
|

Along with its 500cc cousin, the
A50, the problems that beset the A65 typify much of what went wrong with BSA
towards the end of the company. The machines had a poor reputation for
reliability and spares back-up in particular which helped to put the final
nails in the coffin of a large part of the British industry. And yet the
design had its good points, for with modification the engine unit proved
itself in that most demanding of competitions -sidecar racing - while
surviving, hard-working bikes have clocked up thousands of trouble-free
miles.
By the 1960s BSA had become part
of a large conglomerate with diverse interests. There had been a concerted
effort to introduce new systems, and there was an on-going drive to attract
sales in the American market. Despite the popularity of the existing 650cc
twins, they were perceived as being antiquated and were losing out against
Triumph.
The new models were developed
quickly, and many of their problems were the kind that a longer testing
period would have ironed out. On the face of it, though, the new 650 offered
promise, being more sophisticated and lighter than its AlO-based
predecessors.
A unit-construction design with
fashionable 'power egg' streamlined styling was coupled with a single,
almost square, carburettor which promised a free-revving engine. It was
perhaps surprising, therefore, that it initially offered less power than the
top-of-the-range AlO-based machine, the Rocket Gold Star. The frame and
forks.were similar to the duplex cradle unit of the late AlOs, and the
handling was generally quite good, although the rather crude damping of the
front forks found the going tough.
When the A65 and smaller A50
were launched in 1962, they appeared to have plenty going for them. The
styling was in line with the clean, rather lumpy BSA look of the period. The
performance was not bad, with strong acceleration and lOOmph top speed - and
the fuel economy was good.
The problems soon appeared, however. The engines were prone to vibration,
and the main bearings self-destructed at low mileages, often wrecking the
engine. Oil leaks were common and the primary drive chain was also prone to
wear.
This did not prevent an A50 from
taking Gold in the 1962 ISDT, while for the public, the A65 was soon offered
in higher performance versions with sportier styling, higher and higher
compression ratios, and latterly, twin carburettors. One such machine, the
650 Lightning, even managed to win a production race in 1965. For the
all-important American market initially, there were many more variants,
including scramblers.
Power-egg' styling was a popular
fashion in the 1960s, and the 650 BSA unit was perhaps the definitive
version. All functions in the unit engine were smoothly faired in behind
streamlined alloy casings.
By 1966 the top of the range was
the Spitfire Mkll, which sported many racing fittings, such as close-ratio
gears, a larger front brake and fibre-glass tank. It was light and fast,
with 120 mph within reach, and thanks to a new front fork, handled well.
The introduction of I2v
electrics was an improvement that benefited the whole range. But the
vibration problems were still there and although attempts were made to find
a cure, none succeeded. From 1970 on, this flawed power unit was coupled
with a problematic frame. The oil-in-frame unit had a large diameter
backbone which doubled as the oil tank. A similar design was adopted by
Triumph, and although both handled well, the actual seat height precluded
them being ridden comfortably by anyone much under six feet tall.
Handsome in a beefy way, the A65
offered true sports bike performance and the handling to exploit it
The model soldiered on until 1972, despite BSA's growing financial
difficulties. By this time the seat height had been reduced to a much more
workable level, handling was excellent and even the vibration seemed to have
decreased. Sadly it was too late, and the A65 became a victim of BSA cuts.
A postscript to the story is
that a solution to the main-bearing problem had been proposed while
developing the factory racers in 1966-7, but never adopted. After the model
had been discontinued, ex-BSA workers offered this as an after-market
conversion, consisting of a new set of main bearings an optional new oil
pump and clutch modification.