|
Aprilia Tuareg 600 wind

|
Make Model |
Aprilia Tuareg 600 wind |
|
Year |
1990-91 |
|
Engine |
Air cooled, four stroke, single cylinder,
SOHC , 4 valves per cylinder |
|
Capacity |
652 |
|
Bore x Stroke |
94 x 81 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
9.4:1 |
|
Induction |
35mm Dell'Orto PHBR35BD carb |
|
Ignition /
Starting |
Nippondenso electronic / |
|
Max Power |
46 hp @7100 rpm ( 40.07/7000 rpm ) |
|
Max Torque |
4.5 kg-m @ 6000 rpm |
|
Transmission /
Drive |
6 Speed / chain |
|
Front Suspension |
38mm Upside-down forks. 210mm wheel travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Monoshock with adjustable preload. 220mm wheel travel. |
|
Front Brakes |
Single 300mm disc 2 piston caliper |
|
Rear Brakes |
Single 220mm disc |
|
Front Tyre |
90/90-21 |
|
Rear Tyre |
130/80-18 |
|
Dry-Weight / Wet-Weight |
147 kg / 164 kg |
|
Fuel Capacity |
18.4 Litres |
|
Consumption average |
17.2 km/lit |
|
Braking 60 - 0 / 100 - 0 |
13.9 m / 39.9 m |
|
Standing
¼ Mile |
13.9 sec / 147.3 km/h |
|
Top Speed |
165 km/h |

Unfortunately, Italian skill with the paint box was
not enough to exact any respect from the neolithic types who handled the Tuareg
during its trip from Northern Italy to Northern England, and it arrived at the
Manchester base of importers Aprilia UK with the extensive (and expensive)
bodywork bashed to bits. Replacing it was no problem, except that the only spare
plastic was in last year's colours.
So it was that we didn't really get a new bike to
test at all: last year's bike, last year's paint and a nagging suspicion that we
were being fobbed off with a machine that, although deemed to be no longer up to
scratch for the rest of Europe, was an easy option for the UK market compared to
the hassle of homologating the new model. Add to this a gremlin attack on the
starter solenoid and a broken connection in the wiring loom as a result of the
frequent removal of the tank and it would have been easy to write the Tuareg off
as another example of Latin flair for design let down by poor quality control.
That would not really have been fair — a bike can't
choose who handles it in transit, and I am sure that the problems we had with
the electrics all had their root in the original damage to the bodywork.
Besides, it is easy to forgive almost anything just to have that beautiful
Aprilia-spec Rotax burbling and clattering away underneath you.
A very long way underneath you as well. I am not
over-endowed in the leg department, although when standing up they are more or
less the right length (they reach the ground and don't have to bend at the knee
to keep me down to the right height). On the Tuareg I can only reach the floor
by slipping almost all the way off the seat, which I find a little annoying —
you don't need a huge seat height to have good ground clearance. Still, even
that has its good side, since once aloft you have a fine view of the
countryside. I doubt, though, whether that's the real reason for the elevated
perch: I believe that it's so you have a good platform from which to descend at
speed on the kick-start, should you be foolish enough to allow the battery to go
flat.
I liked the bike when we first got it. After all, it
was still the sludgy end of winter, and hardly the weather for a sports bike, so
it didn't really matter that it would only do just over the ton, sat on
over-bouncy suspension and had too many green idiot lights. It was comfortable,
even up to five-hundred-miles-a-day level (I tried this), and quick enough to be
fun whilst not so fast as to remove all hopes of licence retention. It returned
around sixty to the gallon and was quite happy to point its front wheel at the
sky with the minimum of effort.
Then two things happened to make me change my mind:
firstly I was unwise enough to attempt a spot of off-road riding, and secondly
the roads dried out.
I never seriously expected the Tuareg to be any good on the dirt, but I thought
it would be fun to have a go. It wasn't. A combination of high seat, short legs
and top-heavy weight distribution made for several uncomfortable moments when I
couldn't reach the ground quickly enough to avoid disaster.
The lack of any dirt ability was not really a significant black l mark on the
Aprilia's character, j but its off-road pretensions i dictate a suspension and
tyre i choice that has no function ; beyond pure pose-value, and
what it really needs is more road orientated geometry, a smaller, wider front
wheel and some proper tyres. In short, it needs to be the Pegaso that the UK
isn't going to get.
On the road, the narrow twenty-one inch front tyre
felt vague and too inclined to wash
out if it was turned in hard. Shifting body weight forward helped, but the tyre
didn't seem to give any feeling of what it was up to beyond a distant squirming
sensation.
Given my new-found dislike of the Tuareg's handling
characteristics, I was less than enthusiastic when it was the only bike
available to recce Cadwell prior to taking the NWS GSX-R750 (p.52) for its track
test. My misgivings weren't helped by photographer Kenny P. chortling away to
himself about where he could get the best crash shots, and the fact that the
marshal at the club circuit hairpin clearly couldn't decide whether to laugh or
whether to cross himself and take cover. I made a last effort to improve the
steering by dropping the yokes over an inch on the forks and went out hoping it
would break down so I could go home.
Sixty laps later I'd changed my mind again, a
phenomenon not unconnected with the fact that I had learnt more or less which
way the circuit went,
For sale, one Aprilia Tuareg, suit pole vaulter or retired mountaineer.
Strangulated hernia forces sale.
turned the edges of the tyres blue, scraped the pegs through Charlies and
overtaken a GSX-R through the Gooseneck.
I had also fried the new-for-'91 twin disc front
brake with repeated four-fingered abuse at the hairpin, and the clutch was a
little soggy from the heat, but the motor still ticked over quite happily in
between sessions and would almost pull the ton on the back straight. It would
have continued to do so, too, had the sight of an MZ racer sliding across
Mansfield not served as a timely reminder that it is better to pack up before
tiredness and bravado lead you to throw it all away rather than immediately
afterwards.It seems that my desperate attempts to modify the steering
characteristics actually worked, as there were no problems with the front
washing out, even entering bends faster than I would have liked due to the
rapidly disappearing front brake. The only disadvantages are a marginally
reduced inclination to wheelie and a side-stand that already holds the bike too
near the vertical.
Despite my love/hate relationship with the Aprilia,
I'm not keen to give it back. If I could keep it, I'd change the front wheel,
uprate the brakes, fit some sticky tyres and enter a few singles races. I'd
lose, but it wouldn't half be fun, and that is what this bike is all about. KR
Source Performance Bike 1991
|